The Department of Vexation

If, while claiming Carers Benefit

You overstep the cliff-edge earnings limit

The slightest error in your employment

Can lead to a large demand for repayment

When asked to comment on why

Government responds, in a cut’n’paste reply:

“Claimants have a responsibility

To consistently

Inform DWP of any changes

In their circumstances”


The implication is

That this is

A reasonable expectation

And so carers get no dispensation

For mistakenly understating their earning

If the error was small and long in the making

And DWP had the facts the whole time

But only belatedly uncovered the ‘crime’

The carer must repay the whole total accumulated

Those who can’t do so will likely be prosecuted


Yet when it was proposed that there be

Rules about the second jobs of MPs 

The tories said no to limits or penalties

In justifying their failure to set any

Government was unequivocal

To do so would be: “impractical”

As one tory MP explained:

It would “result in vexatious complaints”;

Be “almost impossible” to enforce;

And amount to “policing personal life”


Impossible!

Unreasonable!

Impractical!

Won’t work at all!

… for politicians’ side-line careers

But for the part time jobs of carers …

A legal responsibility!

Vigilance required consistently!

And when DWP spots your error - belatedly!

Prepare to be pursued vexatiously!